Story · February 17, 2024

Trump’s Supreme Court Stay Bid Sat Pending on Feb. 17 as Immunity Fight Moved Forward

Immunity delay Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: On Feb. 17, the Supreme Court had not yet acted on Donald Trump’s stay request in the immunity case; the application was still pending at that time. The Court acted on Feb. 28, 2024.

Donald Trump’s request to freeze the federal election-interference case was still waiting on the Supreme Court on Feb. 17, 2024. The court had not ruled on his application to stay the D.C. Circuit’s mandate, and no new order had changed the posture of the case by the edition date.

The docket shows the sequence. Trump filed both an application for a stay and a petition for certiorari on Feb. 12. The Chief Justice asked the United States to respond on Feb. 13. The government filed its response on Feb. 14, and Trump submitted his reply on Feb. 15. By Feb. 17, the stay application was still pending, and the court had not yet taken further action.

That mattered because the filing was aimed at slowing the case while Trump pressed his immunity argument. He has argued that former presidents cannot be prosecuted for official acts carried out in office. Prosecutors have said the Constitution does not create blanket criminal immunity for a former president. The lower court had already rejected Trump’s immunity claim, and the Supreme Court had not yet said whether it would hear the issue at all.

What had happened later was still in the future on Feb. 17. The Supreme Court would not refer the stay application to the full court, grant certiorari, and keep the mandate on hold until Feb. 28, 2024. On the edition date, though, the only accurate takeaway was narrower: Trump was still waiting, and the court had not yet answered him.

Read next

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.