Story · March 29, 2024

Trump’s Bond Clock Kept Ticking After Court Cut the Price

Money strain Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: An appellate court order on March 25, 2024, reduced the required undertaking in Donald Trump’s New York civil fraud case to $175 million and gave him 10 days to post it. Earlier filings did not amount to a court finding that he was insolvent or unable to pay in full.

Donald Trump’s latest financial test in the New York civil fraud case was no longer the full cost of the judgment. By March 29, 2024, it was the countdown attached to a reduced bond: the Appellate Division, First Department had already said he could pause collection of the disgorgement portion only if he posted a $175 million undertaking within 10 days of its March 25 order.

That mattered because the deadline had not yet expired. Trump’s lawyers had told the court on March 18 that posting a bond for the full judgment amount was impossible while the appeal was pending. Four days later, the trial court’s enormous security demand was narrowed, but not erased. The appellate panel kept the stay conditional, giving Trump and the other appellants until April 4, 2024, to come up with the reduced amount.

The underlying judgment still stood. In the trial court, Justice Arthur F. Engoron had found Trump and other defendants liable for fraudulent conduct and entered a sweeping civil fraud judgment with monetary penalties and business restrictions. The appellate order did not undo those findings. It only changed the terms under which enforcement of the disgorgement portion could be paused during the appeal.

So the real story on March 29 was not that Trump had already failed to satisfy the new bond requirement. It was that he was operating under a hard deadline that had been cut down, but not gone away. The court had given him less time pressure than he faced on March 18 in one sense — a smaller number to secure — while keeping the same basic rule in place: no undertaking, no stay on the money judgment’s collection efforts.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.