Story · April 22, 2024

April 22 Trump interview was later counted as a gag-order violation in the Manhattan hush-money case

Gag-order bait Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: Trump’s April 22 interview was later found to violate the gag order in Judge Merchan’s May 6 contempt order.

Donald Trump’s April 22, 2024 interview on Just the News, No Noise on Real America’s Voice did not trigger a ruling that day. It was later one of the statements Judge Juan M. Merchan found violated the expanded gag order in a May 6 contempt decision. The court said Trump crossed the line when he complained that the judge was rushing the trial, said the jury was picked too fast, and claimed the panel was 95% Democrats in a heavily Democratic area. ([nycourts.gov](https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/DOcontempt_5-6-24FINAL.pdf))

Merchan’s May 6 order said the prosecution had asked the court to hold Trump in criminal contempt over four alleged violations of the expanded order. The judge rejected three of them and found one proved beyond a reasonable doubt: the April 22 interview in which Trump attacked the jury-selection process and the makeup of the jury. The order also repeated the standard the court was enforcing. The gag order barred public statements about prospective or sworn jurors, among others tied to the case. ([nycourts.gov](https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/DOcontempt_5-6-24FINAL.pdf))

The timing matters because the fight was procedural as much as political. The interview came first. Prosecutors then used it in a contempt motion. Merchan later ruled on May 6 that the interview violated the order, and he imposed a $1,000 fine for that violation. In the same order, the court warned that repeated violations could eventually lead to incarceration. ([nycourts.gov](https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/DOcontempt_5-6-24FINAL.pdf))

The result leaves a narrow but important record: Trump was not punished on April 22 itself, and the entire interview was not treated as a blanket contempt finding. The court instead singled out the jury comments as one proven violation, while declining to find contempt on the other three alleged statements reviewed in the same proceeding. That makes the episode less a generic media clash than a specific example of how the gag order was being enforced line by line. ([nycourts.gov](https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/DOcontempt_5-6-24FINAL.pdf))

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Verify the official rules in your state, make sure your registration is current, and share the official deadlines and procedures with people in your community.

Timing: Before your state's registration, absentee, or early-vote deadline.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.