Story · May 14, 2024

Appeals Court Denies Trump Bid to Lift Gag Order as Cohen Testifies

Gag order holds Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: A New York appeals court upheld Donald Trump’s gag order on May 14, 2024, while Michael Cohen continued testifying in Manhattan. House Speaker Mike Johnson criticized the case outside the courthouse that same day.

A New York appeals court on Tuesday denied Donald Trump’s bid to lift the gag order imposed in the hush-money case, leaving the restraining order in place as Michael Cohen continued testifying in the Manhattan trial.

The Appellate Division’s ruling rejected Trump’s challenge to the order issued by Justice Juan M. Merchan. The court said the restrictions were justified by the need to protect the integrity of the proceeding and the people connected to it, including witnesses and others tangentially tied to the case.

The decision kept in place limits on Trump’s public attacks on certain participants in the trial. The order has been central to repeated fights over how much Trump can say about the judge, witnesses and others involved in the case.

Cohen’s testimony continued the same day, keeping the prosecution’s key witness in the spotlight as prosecutors worked through their case over the hush-money payment and the bookkeeping records they say were used to hide it. Cohen is expected to remain a major part of that narrative because of his role in the events at issue and his cooperation with investigators.

The ruling and the testimony landed on the same day, preserving the basic shape of the trial: the court enforcing its limits on Trump’s speech while prosecutors pressed ahead with evidence they say ties the payments and records to the former president’s campaign-year conduct.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.