Story · May 21, 2024

Merchan and lawyers sparred over jury instructions as Trump trial headed for closings

Jury close-in Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.

The Manhattan hush-money trial spent May 21, 2024, on the kind of courtroom work that usually happens just before a case is handed to the jury: the judge and lawyers fought over the instructions that would frame deliberations. With the defense already rested, Judge Juan Merchan and counsel for Donald Trump and the Manhattan district attorney’s office argued over the wording of the charge, including how the court should describe the evidence and the legal standards jurors would be told to apply.

That was the day’s real business. The jury had been sent home for a week, with closing arguments expected on May 28 and deliberations not set to begin until after that. So while the courtroom was still active, the trial was no longer in witness mode. It had moved into the final stretch, where the shape of the jury charge mattered because it would guide how jurors organized everything they had heard.

Merchan also reserved decision on the defense’s request to dismiss the case. He did not rule from the bench that day. Instead, the judge kept the focus on the charging conference and the effort to lock down the instructions before summations.

The result was less theatrical than a witness fight or a dramatic ruling, but more important than it looked. Once a judge starts settling the charge, the trial is no longer about what else might come in through testimony. It is about how the law will be presented once the case is finally turned over to the jury. On May 21, that handoff was still ahead, not yet underway.

Read next

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.