Story · November 5, 2024

Bomb threats disrupted voting and ballot counting in several battleground states

Election-day bomb threats and voting disruption Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: This story has been corrected to identify the Pennsylvania counties involved and to clarify that the court-ordered extension applied to mail ballot acceptance in Centre County, not voting hours generally.

Bomb threats reported at polling places and election-related offices on Nov. 5, 2024, briefly interrupted voting and ballot processing in several battleground states. In some locations, officials cleared buildings, shifted voters, or paused work while law enforcement checked the scenes.

The FBI said the threats it was tracking were not credible. In a statement the agency also said many appeared to originate from Russian email domains, but it did not publicly attribute the hoaxes to Russia as a proven actor.

Officials described disruptions in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Michigan and Wisconsin, though the impact varied sharply from place to place. In some spots, election workers kept operating after a short delay. In others, officials evacuated buildings or moved people to alternate locations while they sorted out the threat.

Pennsylvania saw one of the more notable procedural responses, with a judge authorizing extra time at a ballot-counting site in Clearfield County after a threat prompted disruption there. Arizona officials said threats reached multiple polling places in Navajo County. Georgia officials also reported threats in metro Atlanta, while election officials in Michigan and Wisconsin said they were dealing with similar calls and emails.

The episode did not produce evidence of a credible attack, but it still forced local election workers to spend time on evacuation, screening and rerouting voters instead of administering the vote. That is the point of a bomb threat, even a fake one: to interrupt the process long enough to create confusion, delay and worry at the exact moment a precinct is trying to stay on schedule.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.