Story · December 26, 2024

Smith Report Fight Started Jan. 7, Not Dec. 26

Legal cover-up Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: This story was about actions taken in January 2025. Volume One of the Jack Smith report was released on Jan. 14, 2025, while Volume Two remained under court restriction at the time.

The date matters here. The public fight over Jack Smith’s final report did not happen on Dec. 26, 2024. It started on Jan. 7, 2025, when Smith delivered Volume One of the report to the attorney general and the release dispute moved into court that same day. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/storage/Report-of-Special-Counsel-Smith-Volume-1-January-2025.pdf?utm_source=openai))

That first fight centered on the volume dealing with the election-subversion investigation. The report itself says it was delivered by hand to Attorney General Merrick Garland on Jan. 7, 2025. As the release plan took shape, the Justice Department moved toward making part of the report public while keeping the rest back for the moment. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/storage/Report-of-Special-Counsel-Smith-Volume-1-January-2025.pdf?utm_source=openai))

The immediate court battle was over the classified-documents volume tied to the pending case against Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira. On Jan. 7, 2025, a federal judge temporarily blocked release of that portion while the issue was litigated further. That order did not end the dispute; it just froze the clock while the courts sorted out what could come out and when. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/e73a42b03cc6dc807de32c42dc824f3d?utm_source=openai))

The record also makes clear this was a two-volume report, not one all-purpose document. Volume One covered the election-interference case. Volume Two concerned the classified-documents case. DOJ later posted the Volume One report, while access questions around the other volume kept moving through separate legal proceedings. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/storage/Report-of-Special-Counsel-Smith-Volume-1-January-2025.pdf?utm_source=openai))

So the corrected timeline is simple: the report was submitted on Jan. 7, 2025, the first release fight began that day, and the December date in the original version was wrong. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/storage/Report-of-Special-Counsel-Smith-Volume-1-January-2025.pdf?utm_source=openai))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.