Story · February 13, 2025

Judge orders administration to restore frozen federal funding after finding it still hadn’t fully complied

Spending freeze court fight Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: On February 10, the court enforced an earlier order requiring the administration to restore frozen federal funding; it did not issue a new ruling on the merits of the funding freeze.

A federal judge in Rhode Island ruled on February 10, 2025, that the Trump administration had not fully complied with an earlier temporary restraining order blocking a broad federal funding pause. Judge John J. McConnell Jr. said the government had to immediately restore frozen funding, end the pause, and take steps to carry out the court’s order. ([storage.courtlistener.com](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.rid.58912/gov.uscourts.rid.58912.96.0_2.pdf))

The ruling did not start the fight. It enforced a January 31 restraining order that had already barred the administration from pausing obligations or disbursements based on the Office of Management and Budget directive and related executive actions. In the February 10 order, McConnell said the states challenging the policy had shown some agencies were still freezing funds or refusing to resume payments. ([storage.courtlistener.com](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.rid.58912/gov.uscourts.rid.58912.96.0_2.pdf))

The order told the government to clear administrative, operational and technical hurdles that were keeping money from moving. It also required the administration to restore withheld funds, including money appropriated under the Inflation Reduction Act and the infrastructure law, while the underlying case continued. ([storage.courtlistener.com](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.rid.58912/gov.uscourts.rid.58912.96.0_2.pdf))

The administration appealed the district court’s orders the same day, including the January 31 temporary restraining order, the February 6 extension and the February 10 enforcement order. The First Circuit later declined to put the lower-court ruling on hold, leaving the spending freeze blocked for the moment. ([storage.courtlistener.com](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.rid.58912/gov.uscourts.rid.58912.98.0_1.pdf))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.