Story · March 31, 2025

Justice Department Files Texas Suit Over AFGE Affiliates’ Federal Labor Contracts

Union crackdown Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: The Justice Department filed the lawsuit late Thursday, March 27, 2025; its announcement was released Friday, March 28, 2025.

The Justice Department said Friday, March 28, 2025, that it filed a lawsuit the night before in the Western District of Texas on behalf of eight federal agencies against affiliates of the American Federation of Government Employees. The case seeks a declaratory judgment on whether those agencies may end collective bargaining agreements they say interfere with national-security work.

The filing came a day after the president issued an executive order titled Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs. DOJ said the order reflects the president’s determination that several agencies and subdivisions perform investigative and national-security work and therefore should not be required to bargain in ways that conflict with those missions.

According to the department, the plaintiffs are seeking to terminate collective bargaining agreements with AFGE locals, councils and Division 10, which the government says block the agencies from carrying out workforce policies tied to their national-security responsibilities. The lawsuit says the agencies are asking for legal certainty before moving ahead.

Attorney General Pamela Bondi said the department is “taking this fight directly to the public-sector unions” and said the Texas filing is aimed at protecting the president’s effort to ensure unions do not interfere with national-security functions. The complaint also argues that the president and senior executive-branch officials cannot carry out intelligence, counterintelligence and investigative missions if bargaining agreements limit oversight and accountability.

The case is a test of the executive order’s reach as applied to these agencies and contracts. It does not itself resolve the broader legality of federal labor policy, but it does put the administration’s national-security argument before a court in a concrete dispute over existing agreements.

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

January 6 Fallout Kept Closing In On Trump

★★★★★Fuckup rating 5/5

The January 6 investigation was still tightening around Trump-world on December 5, 2021, and every new document, public statement, and legal move made the former presiden…

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Check the official docket, read the source documents, and submit a public comment when the agency opens or updates the rulemaking record. Share the primary documents, not just commentary.

Timing: Before the public-comment deadline.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.