Story · July 28, 2025

Trump repeats his Epstein breakup explanation as Murdoch fight moves in court

Epstein drag Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.

Donald Trump spent July 28 revisiting one of the oldest and messiest parts of his public past. Speaking to reporters in Scotland, he repeated his own explanation for why he broke with Jeffrey Epstein: Epstein had hired people who worked for him, and Trump said he threw Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. That is Trump’s account of the breakup, not an independently verified finding, but it was the version he chose to put back on the record.

The remark mattered because Trump was not trying to reopen the history so much as control it. He framed the split as a business-and-staffing dispute and again distanced himself from Epstein’s later notoriety. The interview did not settle the underlying questions about the relationship, but it did show Trump still willing to answer them in public rather than let them sit untouched.

The same day, Trump’s lawyers filed a motion in the Southern District of Florida in Trump v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc. seeking to compel an expedited deposition of Rupert Murdoch. The filing, dated July 28, 2025, asks the court to move quickly on Murdoch’s testimony in Trump’s defamation suit over Wall Street Journal reporting tied to Epstein. The motion says Murdoch is 94 and argues for taking his deposition sooner rather than later.

Taken together, the two developments kept Epstein at the center of Trump’s day in two different settings: a public explanation from the president and a court filing from his lawyers. One was Trump’s own account of an old rupture. The other was a procedural push in a separate case built around Epstein-related coverage. Neither put the subject away.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.