Story · September 14, 2025

DOJ, White House Ask For Public Comment On State Laws That May Affect Interstate Commerce

Federal overreach Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.

The Justice Department and the National Economic Council on Aug. 15 opened a request for information asking the public to identify state laws, regulations, policies, practices and causes of action that significantly and adversely affect the national economy or interstate commerce. The docket is open through Sept. 15, 2025. It is a solicitation for comments, not a preemption action and not an enforcement decision. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-and-national-economic-council-partner-identify-state-laws-out-state))

The notice asks commenters to identify which state laws burden commerce in other states or between states, whether any of those measures may already be preempted by existing federal authority, whether Congress or agencies could address them, and which federal agency would have the best subject-matter expertise. In other words, the administration is asking for examples and possible fixes before deciding whether to do anything else. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-and-national-economic-council-partner-identify-state-laws-out-state))

The filing also ties the effort to the administration’s broader deregulatory agenda and says state-level practices can drive up nationwide costs. It specifically invites comments from consumers, small businesses, employers, trade groups, industry analysts, states and other affected parties. The government’s own language is broad, but the practical effect is narrower: a public record that could inform later federal steps, if any are taken. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-and-national-economic-council-partner-identify-state-laws-out-state))

What it does not do is announce a new federal power to override state law. The notice asks whether identified laws may be preempted and whether other federal legislative or regulatory tools might exist, but any later move would require its own legal basis and process. For now, the document is a paper trail, not a final answer. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-and-national-economic-council-partner-identify-state-laws-out-state))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.