Story · April 14, 2026

Judge tosses Trump’s Epstein-related defamation suit, with room to refile

Epstein do-over Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.

A federal judge in Florida has dismissed Donald Trump’s defamation suit against the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch, but the case is not dead yet. The dismissal was without prejudice, which means Trump can try again if his lawyers can fix the pleading problems the court identified. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/40e7aba7731db9e8800488038cb92a66?utm_source=openai))

The ruling came from U.S. District Judge Darrin P. Gayles on April 13, 2026. According to the court’s order as described in the reporting, the judge found Trump had not made the required showing at this stage that the article was published with malicious intent. That left the original complaint out of court, but it did not close off an amended filing. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/40e7aba7731db9e8800488038cb92a66?utm_source=openai))

Trump then said on social media that the dismissal was “not a termination” and that he would refile the case “on or before April 27th.” Based on that, April 27 appears to be the refile date Trump publicly committed to, rather than a deadline we can safely attribute to the judge’s order without seeing the exact text of the docket entry. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/40e7aba7731db9e8800488038cb92a66?utm_source=openai))

The dispute centers on the Journal’s reporting about a 2003 birthday album letter allegedly bearing Trump’s signature and linked to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump has denied the allegations and sued for $10 billion. For now, the practical result is simple: he lost the first round, but the courthouse door is still cracked open. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/ece8a837f9bd179771f801a765e242e4?utm_source=openai))

Read next

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.