Story · May 4, 2026

CREW and FPF sue after DOJ memo says the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional and White House revises records policy

Records revolt Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Updated for chronology: the OLC opinion was issued April 1, 2026, the White House revised records guidance April 2, 2026, and CREW/FPF filed suit April 24, 2026.

A Justice Department memo and a new White House records policy have landed the presidential records fight in federal court. CREW and the Freedom of the Press Foundation filed suit on April 24, 2026, challenging an Office of Legal Counsel opinion dated April 1 that said the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional. The complaint says the White House then issued revised recordkeeping guidance on April 2 and adopted the opinion’s logic in its own policy. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/olc/media/1434131/dl?inline=))

The memo, signed by the Office of Legal Counsel for the counsel to the president, says the PRA exceeds Congress’s powers and intrudes on executive authority. The complaint says that conclusion was not just academic: the White House’s April 2 policy allegedly reduced obligations for preserving presidential records, especially text messages and other electronic material. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/olc/media/1434131/dl?inline=))

Under the PRA, incumbent presidents have custody and management responsibility for presidential records while they are in office, and the National Archives says the law is meant to govern how those records are preserved and transferred after a presidency ends. CREW and FPF say the new policy cuts against those preservation rules and ask the court to block it. ([archives.gov](https://www.archives.gov/news/topics/presidential-records-act))

The complaint also says no court has ever declared the PRA unconstitutional. It argues that letting an internal legal opinion override the statute would weaken the mandatory recordkeeping system Congress built after Watergate and blur the line between presidential preference and legal duty. That claim is still just an allegation unless and until a court rules on it. ([citizensforethics.org](https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Complaint-FPF-v.-Trump_Redacted.pdf))

The case now asks a judge to decide whether the White House can rely on the memo to change how it handles records, or whether the PRA still binds the executive branch as written. ([citizensforethics.org](https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Complaint-FPF-v.-Trump_Redacted.pdf))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.