Story · June 11, 2026

Nineteen States and D.C. Sue Over Trump Contract DEI Terms

DEI contract enforcement Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: This lawsuit was filed June 10, 2026. The contract clause was already being rolled out earlier, with agencies directed to use it in new contracts by April 24 and to seek modifications to existing contracts by July 24, 2026.
Nineteen States and D.C. Sue Over Trump Contract DEI Terms reader image
Reader image selected by automatic review and community voting.

Nineteen states and the District of Columbia filed suit on June 10 in federal court in Maryland, seeking to block the Trump administration from enforcing new contract language tied to President Trump’s March 26 executive order on federal contractors and DEI. The plaintiffs say the government moved ahead without giving contractors a workable explanation of what the clause requires or how agencies are supposed to apply it. ([oag.ca.gov](https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/001%202026-06-10%20Complaint.pdf))

The complaint challenges an order that directs agencies to insert a certification into covered contracts and subcontracts barring what the White House describes as “racially discriminatory DEI activities.” It also says agencies may cancel or suspend awards, pursue debarment, and treat the certification as material to payment decisions under the False Claims Act. ([whitehouse.gov](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/03/addressing-dei-discrimination-by-federal-contractors/))

According to the complaint, agencies began rolling out the clause in April and were instructed to extend it to existing contracts by July 24, 2026. The states say that process skipped the notice-and-comment requirements they say should have applied before the government changed the terms that contractors must accept. The filing also says the administration estimated the policy could affect as many as 640,000 contracts and subcontracts, involving more than 34,000 vendors. ([oag.ca.gov](https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/001%202026-06-10%20Complaint.pdf))

The lawsuit argues the administration acted beyond its authority, violated the Administrative Procedure Act, and failed to distinguish the new clause from longstanding anti-discrimination rules already built into federal contracting. The plaintiffs are asking the court to stop the agencies from enforcing the new requirements while the case proceeds. ([oag.ca.gov](https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/001%202026-06-10%20Complaint.pdf))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

Nineteen States and D.C. Sue Over Trump Contract DEI Terms reader image 1
Score: 95 AI / 0 community
By: mike
Current main image

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.