Story · July 26, 2021

Thomas Barrack Pleads Not Guilty in UAE Foreign-Agent Case

Foreign-agent mess Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: Thomas Barrack was arraigned and entered a not-guilty plea on July 26, 2021, after the indictment was unsealed on July 20, 2021.

Thomas Barrack appeared in federal court in Brooklyn on July 26, 2021 and pleaded not guilty to charges that he acted as an unregistered agent of the United Arab Emirates. The arraignment followed a July 20 indictment unsealed by federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of New York, which accused Barrack, Matthew Grimes, and Rashid Sultan Rashid Al Malik Alshahhi of acting and conspiring to act at the direction of senior UAE officials between April 2016 and April 2018. Barrack was also charged with obstruction of justice and making false statements. The Justice Department says the indictment contains allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/former-advisor-presidential-candidate-among-three-defendants-charged-acting-agents))

According to the indictment, prosecutors say Barrack used his position as an informal adviser to a presidential campaign and later as chairman of the Presidential Inaugural Committee to advance UAE interests without notifying the attorney general as required under foreign-agent law. The filing says he and his co-defendants were in repeated contact with senior UAE officials and sought to influence U.S. policy positions and public messaging in ways favorable to the emirates. Prosecutors also allege that Barrack and Grimes used secure communications and passed along information and talking points tied to UAE interests. Those are the claims now headed to court; they are not findings. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/former-advisor-presidential-candidate-among-three-defendants-charged-acting-agents))

Barrack’s role in the Trump inauguration gives the case its political charge, but the official record is narrower than the surrounding commentary. The government’s theory is that Barrack’s access and status made him valuable to UAE officials, not that any particular policy outcome was definitively caused by his conduct. The case now moves into the ordinary grind of criminal litigation, where the indictment will have to be tested in court and the government will have to prove its allegations. For now, the only settled facts are the charges, the plea, and the date of the arraignment. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/former-advisor-presidential-candidate-among-three-defendants-charged-acting-agents))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.