Story · October 21, 2021

House votes to hold Steve Bannon in contempt over Jan. 6 subpoena

Contempt trap Confidence 5/5
★★★★★Fuckup rating 5/5
Five-alarm fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.

The House voted Thursday, Oct. 21, 2021, to hold Steve Bannon in contempt of Congress, approving a resolution by a 229-202 margin and setting up a referral to the U.S. attorney in Washington for possible prosecution. The resolution says Bannon failed to comply with a subpoena from the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack and directs the Speaker to certify the committee’s report to federal prosecutors. ([congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/730/text))

Bannon, a former Trump White House strategist, had been ordered to produce documents and appear for a deposition before the committee. Instead, he did not comply, prompting lawmakers to advance the contempt process on the House floor. The vote made the dispute a formal legal matter under federal contempt-of-Congress procedures rather than just a fight over whether he would cooperate voluntarily. ([congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/730/text))

The committee and its supporters framed the refusal as an obstacle to a broader inquiry into the pressure campaign surrounding the 2020 election and the attack on the Capitol. The resolution itself is narrower than the larger politics around it: it covers Bannon’s failure to honor the subpoena and sends the matter to prosecutors. What happens next depends on the Justice Department, not the House vote alone. ([congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/730/text))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the legislation

Read the bill or hearing record, then contact the federal lawmakers responsible for the measure and ask for a written response about the specific vote or policy at issue.

Timing: Before the next scheduled committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.