Story · December 6, 2021

By Dec. 6, January 6 Cases Were Still Moving Through the System

Jan. 6 legal grind Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: the House Jan. 6 select committee subpoenaed Phil Waldron on Dec. 16, not in early December.

By Dec. 6, 2021, the Jan. 6 investigation was no longer just a response to the attack itself. It had become a steady criminal and congressional process, with the Justice Department still filing cases tied to the Capitol breach and the House select committee pushing ahead with its work. Official releases in the first week of December showed the pace was still moving: a Georgia man pleaded guilty on Dec. 1, a Michigan man was arrested on Dec. 2, and two more men were charged on Dec. 3 in cases connected to the attack on the Capitol. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/georgia-man-pleads-guilty-assaulting-law-enforcement-during-jan-6-capitol-breach?utm_source=openai))

Those cases were not just symbolic. They added more detail to the paper trail around the attack — who was present, what officers were confronted with, and how prosecutors were charging conduct at the scene. The Dec. 3 case, for example, included allegations of obstruction and other offenses tied to the breach. The Dec. 2 arrest involved charges including assault on law enforcement, civil disorder, and entering a restricted area with a dangerous weapon. The Dec. 1 plea admitted conduct against officers inside the Capitol. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/two-men-charged-obstructing-law-enforcement-during-jan-6-capitol-breach?utm_source=openai))

Congress was building its own record at the same time. The House select committee had already begun issuing subpoenas and holding meetings in late November and early December, including a Dec. 1 business meeting on a contempt report for Jeffrey Clark. That was part of a broader push to gather records and testimony as the committee tried to reconstruct the run-up to Jan. 6 and the effort to overturn the election. ([docs.house.gov](https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventId=114281&utm_source=openai))

The significance of Dec. 6 is not that it brought one dramatic new turn. It is that the investigation was clearly still in motion on both fronts. Prosecutors were adding arrests and pleas. The committee was moving documents and testimony through a formal process. The bigger point was the same on both tracks: Jan. 6 was becoming a long-running case file, not a closed political argument. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/two-men-charged-obstructing-law-enforcement-during-jan-6-capitol-breach?utm_source=openai))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the legislation

Read the bill or hearing record, then contact the federal lawmakers responsible for the measure and ask for a written response about the specific vote or policy at issue.

Timing: Before the next scheduled committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.