Story · December 12, 2022

Judge dismisses Trump’s Mar-a-Lago lawsuit after appellate ruling ends special-master review

Mar-a-Lago lawsuit formally dismissed after appellate ruling Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: This article has been updated to clarify the timing and posture of the Mar-a-Lago lawsuit and special-master ruling.

A federal judge on Dec. 12, 2022, formally dismissed Donald Trump’s lawsuit over the Mar-a-Lago search, saying the court lacked jurisdiction to keep the case going. The order came after the Eleventh Circuit had already ruled on Dec. 1 that the district court could not block the government from using lawfully seized records in the criminal investigation, which effectively ended the special-master review Trump had sought. ([media.ca11.uscourts.gov](https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202213005.pdf))

The dismissal cleared the docket in a case Trump had used to press for extra judicial review of documents taken from his Florida resort. In the underlying dispute, his lawyers argued that a special master should sort through the material before investigators could keep using it, citing privilege concerns and the handling of records seized in the search. The appeals court rejected that framework, and Cannon’s later order brought the district court case into line with that ruling. ([media.ca11.uscourts.gov](https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202213005.pdf))

The practical effect was to remove the last court-based hold Trump had on the special-master process in that lawsuit. The case itself was only one part of the broader classified-documents investigation, which also involved questions about retained government records and possible obstruction. Cannon’s Dec. 12 order did not add a new merits ruling on those issues; it ended the civil action Trump had filed to try to slow review of the seized materials. ([media.ca11.uscourts.gov](https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202213005.pdf))

A separate development that day underscored how busy Trump’s legal calendar was becoming: prosecutors in the Georgia election investigation issued a subpoena to Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. That subpoena was part of a different inquiry and had no effect on the Mar-a-Lago dismissal. ([media.ca11.uscourts.gov](https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202213005.pdf))

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Check the official docket, read the source documents, and submit a public comment when the agency opens or updates the rulemaking record. Share the primary documents, not just commentary.

Timing: Before the public-comment deadline.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.