Story · January 14, 2023

Proud Boys Trial Puts Jan. 6 Election Claims Back on Display

Jan. 6 hangover Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: The Proud Boys trial opening statements were on Jan. 12, 2023. The case concerns alleged seditious conspiracy to obstruct the Electoral College certification, not a trial about Trump himself.

WASHINGTON — The Proud Boys sedition trial that opened Thursday in federal court put the Jan. 6 attack back in the spotlight, with prosecutors telling jurors the defendants helped build and carry out a plan to resist the transfer of power after the 2020 election.

The Justice Department’s case is that Enrique Tarrio and other Proud Boys leaders coordinated before Jan. 6 and then used force around the Capitol breach to try to stop Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s victory. That is the government’s allegation, not a finding by the jury. Defense lawyers have said the men were engaged in political activity and deny that they joined a conspiracy to block the electoral count.

The indictment lays out the charges against Tarrio and his co-defendants and says the group conspired to obstruct the certification of the presidential vote. Prosecutors have tied the case to the broader effort to overturn the election, arguing the defendants did not simply drift into the mob but acted with a purpose.

Trump is not on trial in the case. Still, his election-fraud claims and his push to keep supporters focused on the 2020 result remain part of the factual background prosecutors are asking jurors to weigh. The case adds another official record to the federal government’s effort to show how the Capitol attack fit into the pressure campaign against the election results.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.