Story · February 11, 2023

Trump Team Turned Over Extra Classified-Marked Pages, Laptop and Empty Folder

Docs cleanup Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: Trump’s legal team recently turned over additional materials, including an empty folder marked “Classified Evening Briefing” and a Trump aide’s laptop. The folder was reportedly handed over to investigators; it was not described as part of a newly announced Feb. 10 seizure or search.

Trump’s lawyers had recently turned over additional pages with classified markings, along with a laptop belonging to a Trump aide and an empty folder marked “Classified Evening Briefing,” according to reporting published Feb. 10-11, 2023. The materials were described as having been provided to investigators in the course of the continuing Mar-a-Lago document review, not as part of a newly announced seizure or search.

That chronology matters. The reporting did not say the empty folder was found empty in a fresh recovery operation on Feb. 10. It said the folder had been turned over in recent months. Separately, a search weeks earlier found a handful of pages with classified markings at Mar-a-Lago under supervision of Trump’s legal team, and those pages were promptly provided to the Justice Department. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/91b5b16807b533b3ff27e9303aef38ae?utm_source=openai))

The empty folder is notable because the label makes its contents, or former contents, part of the record. But the existence of that folder alone does not establish how or why it ended up that way. The same goes for the aide’s laptop: it is an item with custody questions, not proof of obstruction. Any claim that the folder or laptop shows intentional mishandling would go beyond what the cited reporting established. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/91b5b16807b533b3ff27e9303aef38ae?utm_source=openai))

What the reporting did show is that investigators were still receiving additional material after earlier returns and searches. That keeps the underlying question alive: what records were still in circulation, and when were they actually accounted for? It does not, on its own, answer whether anyone broke the law. Official findings would have to do that. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/91b5b16807b533b3ff27e9303aef38ae?utm_source=openai))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Check the official docket, read the source documents, and submit a public comment when the agency opens or updates the rulemaking record. Share the primary documents, not just commentary.

Timing: Before the public-comment deadline.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.