Story · July 25, 2023

Trump’s Classified-Documents Delay Bid Meets DOJ Pushback

Delay fails Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: This story has been updated to clarify the July 13, 2023, filing in which the Justice Department opposed Donald Trump’s request to delay the classified-documents trial.

Donald Trump’s bid to push the classified-documents case beyond the 2024 election drew a formal objection from the Justice Department on July 13, 2023. In a court filing, prosecutors asked the judge to reject the request and said there was no basis in law or fact for an open-ended postponement of the trial. ([cnbc.com](https://www.cnbc.com/2023/07/13/doj-opposes-trump-bid-to-indefinitely-delay-classified-documents-trial.html?utm_source=openai))

The filing was a direct response to Trump’s request, made earlier that week, to move the case off the calendar until after the election. His lawyers argued that the timing of the trial would interfere with his campaign and make preparation difficult. Prosecutors rejected that framing and told the court the case should keep moving on the schedule already set by the judge. ([forbes.com](https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2023/07/11/trump-asks-court-to-delay-classified-documents-trial-until-after-2024-election/?utm_source=openai))

The government’s position was not subtle: it wanted the court to treat Trump’s proposal as unsupported and too open-ended to justify a delay. The filing also marked the first major procedural clash over timing in the documents case after the indictment, showing that the fight over the calendar was going to be part of the litigation itself. ([cnbc.com](https://www.cnbc.com/2023/07/13/doj-opposes-trump-bid-to-indefinitely-delay-classified-documents-trial.html?utm_source=openai))

At issue was a prosecution built around allegations that Trump kept classified White House records after leaving office and then resisted efforts to recover them. That backdrop made the timing dispute politically charged, but the immediate question before the court was narrower: whether Trump had shown any legal reason to stop the case from proceeding toward trial. Prosecutors said he had not. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/storage/US-v-Trump-Nauta-De-Oliveira-23-80101.pdf?utm_source=openai))

The result, at least for that filing, was clear. Trump asked for more time. The Justice Department said no. ([cnbc.com](https://www.cnbc.com/2023/07/13/doj-opposes-trump-bid-to-indefinitely-delay-classified-documents-trial.html?utm_source=openai))

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.