Story · September 2, 2023

Trump files not-guilty waiver and asks to split off Georgia case

Georgia legal squeeze Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Trump filed his not-guilty waiver and severance request on Aug. 31, 2023. The filing waived his Sept. 6 arraignment appearance; it did not resolve severance or change the indictment.

Donald Trump filed a written not-guilty waiver on Aug. 31, 2023 in the Fulton County election-interference case and asked the court to sever his case from some co-defendants. The filing let him avoid an in-person arraignment that had been set for Sept. 6, but it did not itself resolve whether his case would be separated or change the indictment against him. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/25a0d9cffd038eb88b805525c85ed0c5))

The request added another procedural layer to a case that already includes Trump and multiple co-defendants charged in connection with efforts to overturn Georgia’s 2020 election result. The court filing put Trump on the same criminal track as the others while also asking the judge to treat his case differently for trial management. That is a scheduling question, not a ruling on the merits. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/25a0d9cffd038eb88b805525c85ed0c5))

The severance issue matters because defendants in the case were not all moving on the same timetable. A separate filing from the Fulton County docket shows the dispute over severance was already active, with lawyers arguing over how the court should handle defendants who wanted a speedy trial versus those who did not. The Aug. 31 waiver did not settle that fight. ([fultonclerk.org](https://www.fultonclerk.org/DocumentCenter/View/2146/RESPONSE-08-31-2023-111042-39231268-8192813A-C4E3-4ABE-AF0D-01859CF730E7))

Trump remained under indictment after the filing, and the case stayed on the court’s calendar. The practical effect of the waiver was narrow: it spared him from appearing for arraignment. The broader fight over how the case should proceed was still in the judge’s hands. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/25a0d9cffd038eb88b805525c85ed0c5))

Read next

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.