Story · September 14, 2023

Trump files emergency bid as judge pauses New York fraud trial

Legal maneuvering before trial Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: An appellate judge issued a temporary stay on Sept. 14 while the full court reviewed Trump’s request; the stay was lifted on Sept. 28, allowing the trial to proceed.

Donald Trump’s lawyers went to New York’s intermediate appellate court on Sept. 14, 2023, with an emergency request aimed at stopping the civil fraud trial that had been scheduled to start Oct. 2. The case was brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who accused Trump and his company of misstating asset values by as much as $3.6 billion over several years. That figure was an allegation in the lawsuit, not a court finding at that stage. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/7453bc6b19939053a7415cc745f2c148?utm_source=openai))

The filing did not end the matter. Justice David Friedman granted an interim stay that same day, which temporarily put the trial on hold while a five-judge panel considered the request on an expedited basis. Court notices and later reporting said the panel was expected to rule within days, not immediately. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/7453bc6b19939053a7415cc745f2c148?utm_source=openai))

Trump’s lawyers used an Article 78 petition to challenge Judge Arthur Engoron’s refusal to grant a further delay and his handling of the case’s scope. Their complaint argued that the trial should not go forward until the appellate issue was resolved. ([ny1.com](https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/ap-top-news/2023/09/14/donald-trumps-last-minute-legal-challenge-could-disrupt-new-york-fraud-trial?utm_source=openai))

The pause turned out to be temporary. On Sept. 28, 2023, the appellate court rejected Trump’s bid to delay the trial and lifted the stay, clearing the way for the bench trial to begin as scheduled on Oct. 2. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/d8934da24e78ca0cedab7303efdf48bd?utm_source=openai))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.