Story · October 25, 2023

Judge fines Trump $10,000 over gag-order violation in New York fraud trial

Gag order enforcement in the New York civil fraud trial Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: This article has been updated to clarify that the $10,000 fine was imposed on Oct. 25, 2023, for violating the civil-trial gag order and that it followed an earlier, separate $5,000 sanction on Oct. 20 for a different violation. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/7f6e536e97d77ef1cd441e4d5ec41ee4?utm_source=openai))

A New York judge on Oct. 25, 2023, fined Donald Trump $10,000 after finding that comments he made outside the courtroom violated a limited gag order in his civil fraud trial. Judge Arthur Engoron said Trump’s hallway remarks crossed a line the court had already set to protect court staff from public attacks.

The penalty followed a $5,000 fine imposed five days earlier, on Oct. 20, after the judge concluded that an earlier social media post about a court staffer had remained visible on Trump’s campaign website even after it was removed from Truth Social. Together, the two sanctions put a price tag on repeated violations of the order the court issued on Oct. 3.

Engoron has said the gag order can be enforced more aggressively if the violations continue. He warned that future breaches could lead to contempt sanctions and, in some circumstances, jail. On Oct. 25, however, the punishment was the $10,000 fine, not an arrest or immediate detention.

The ruling added another layer of conflict to a case already moving through a high-profile fraud trial. Trump’s lawyers have argued that the restrictions on his speech are too broad, while the judge has said the order is necessary to keep the proceedings from being derailed by attacks on staff. For now, the record is straightforward: Trump was told not to make certain public comments, and the court said he did it anyway.

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Check the official docket, read the source documents, and submit a public comment when the agency opens or updates the rulemaking record. Share the primary documents, not just commentary.

Timing: Before the public-comment deadline.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.