Story · November 25, 2023

Trump’s Jan. 6 case was still hanging over the campaign

Election trap Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.

By Nov. 25, 2023, Donald Trump’s federal election-interference case was still active and still part of the political backdrop to his campaign. Special counsel Jack Smith had unsealed the indictment on Aug. 1, 2023, charging Trump with conspiring to defraud the United States, conspiring to disenfranchise voters, and conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding. Smith said the case was built around lies aimed at the process of collecting, counting and certifying the presidential vote. The indictment was only an accusation, not a verdict, but it kept the former president tied to a criminal case rooted in his effort to reverse the 2020 election result. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco-smith/speech/special-counsel-jack-smith-delivers-statement-0))

As of that date, the case remained in district court. The later Supreme Court stay application in the immunity fight was not docketed until Feb. 12, 2024, so the procedural posture on Nov. 25, 2023 was still well before that stage. In plain terms: the case had not yet moved into the later Supreme Court stay proceedings, and it was still pending below. ([supremecourt.gov](https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23a745.html))

That left Trump running for office with a live federal prosecution still in the background. The legal case did not decide the election, and it did not resolve his guilt or innocence. But it did keep the post-2020 fight in view while he campaigned, forcing voters and rivals alike to confront a candidacy wrapped around allegations that he tried to interfere with the transfer of power. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco-smith/speech/special-counsel-jack-smith-delivers-statement-0))

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.