Story · June 4, 2024

Trump lawyers ask judge to lift hush-money gag order after conviction

Gag order backlash Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: Trump’s lawyers filed their request to lift the gag order on Tuesday, June 4, 2024, after the May 30 verdict; the order was originally issued March 26 and later expanded.

Donald Trump’s lawyers asked a New York judge on June 4, 2024, to lift the gag order that limited what he could say publicly about people tied to his hush-money case. The request came days after the jury convicted him on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, and before sentencing was set for July 11. The defense said the case had moved past the trial stage and argued Trump should no longer be barred from speaking about the matter as he campaigned for president.

The gag order was first imposed in March, when Judge Juan Merchan said Trump’s prior public statements created a risk to the orderly administration of the case. The order covered statements about witnesses, jurors, court staff, and some family members of people working on the case. It was later expanded after Trump attacked the judge’s daughter and others connected to the proceedings. The written order said the court had a duty to prevent outside influences from disrupting the fairness of the trial.

In their June 4 letter, Trump’s lawyers said the restrictions were no longer needed now that the jury had returned a verdict. They also argued that Trump should be able to answer criticism from President Joe Biden, Michael Cohen, and Stormy Daniels, and that he needed more latitude as he prepared for the June 27 presidential debate. The letter framed the gag order as an improper restraint on political speech at a time when Trump was trying to campaign under a criminal conviction.

Manhattan prosecutors pushed back, saying the order should stay in place at least until sentencing. Their response said Trump had continued to target people associated with the case and argued the court still had an interest in protecting jurors, witnesses, and staff from intimidation or retaliation. The dispute now sits on top of a broader fight over how much leeway a convicted defendant can get to talk like a candidate while still bound by court rules.

The request is not unusual as a post-trial legal move. What makes it politically charged is the record that led to the gag order in the first place: repeated attacks on people connected to the case, followed by a judge’s effort to keep those attacks from spilling further into the proceedings. Even after the verdict, the same tension remains. Trump’s lawyers want the rules loosened. Prosecutors say the court is still allowed to keep them in place until the case is fully finished.

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Check the official docket, read the source documents, and submit a public comment when the agency opens or updates the rulemaking record. Share the primary documents, not just commentary.

Timing: Before the public-comment deadline.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.