Story · April 12, 2025

Trump Media filing kept Delaware and Florida litigation on the books

Legal cloud Confidence 5/5
★★☆☆☆Fuckup rating 2/5
Noticeable stumble Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: A prior version misstated the timing of the White House tariff order; it was issued April 9, 2025, with an April 10 effective date.

Trump Media’s April 11, 2025 filing was not a splashy one. It did not unveil a new allegation or announce a fresh crisis. Instead, it showed the company was still listing two merger-related legal fights that have followed it since the deal that took it public.

The filing says the Delaware Court of Chancery case brought by United Atlantic Ventures remained active. It states that the remaining defendants had fully briefed motions to dismiss the third amended complaint, as well as a motion to dismiss or stay the case based on temporary presidential immunity. The court had scheduled a hearing on those motions for May 15, 2025.

The same filing also describes the Florida case involving ARC, Patrick Orlando, United Atlantic Ventures, Andrew Litinsky and Wesley Moss. In that matter, the company said defendants appealed an order imposing contempt sanctions and that the appeal was scheduled for oral argument on June 4, 2025. The filing ties that date to the specific appeal, not to the Delaware case.

The chronology matters. The White House tariff order referenced in the original version of this story was issued on April 9, 2025 and set an effective date of April 10, 2025. It was not the same day as the Trump Media filing. The cleaner read is simpler: on April 11, Trump Media was still disclosing open court fights that had not gone away, while the tariff action had already been on the books for two days.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.