The Daily Fuckup

A progressive daily ledger of Trump-world self-owns, legal pain, policy blowback, and bad-faith chaos.

Skip to the news
Story · April 17, 2025

Supreme Court Puts Trump Birthright-Citizenship Stay Requests on Hold for May 15 Argument

By The Daily Fuckup Newsroom · From the April 17, 2025 edition

Courtroom cleanup Confidence 4/5
Climate Courts Immigration
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: The Supreme Court did not rule on the merits of the birthright-citizenship stay requests on April 17; it deferred them and set the consolidated applications for oral argument on May 15, 2025.

The Supreme Court on Thursday, April 17, 2025, put the Trump administration’s emergency requests in three birthright-citizenship cases on pause and set them for oral argument instead of ruling immediately. In a one-page order, the court said consideration of the partial-stay applications in Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey was deferred pending oral argument. The applications were consolidated, and the court allotted one hour for argument at 10 a.m. on Thursday, May 15, 2025.

The order does not decide whether the administration can enforce its challenged birthright-citizenship policy. It leaves the stay requests unresolved until the justices hear argument next month.

That April 17 order is separate from an April 9 emergency order in Trump v. Wilcox. In that case, Chief Justice John Roberts stayed two district court orders from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and set a response deadline of April 15, 2025, at 5 p.m. EDT. The Wilcox order was not part of the birthright-citizenship docket the court addressed on April 17.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Further reporting

Read other reputable coverage

These links are surfaced automatically only when the audit pipeline finds reputable outside coverage that helps readers compare reporting without rewriting it.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment

No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.