Story · March 21, 2026

Judge Dismisses U.S. Suit Over Colorado and Denver Immigration Limits

Sanctuary loss Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: A federal judge dismissed the DOJ’s Colorado and Denver sanctuary-lawsuit on March 31, 2026.

A federal judge in Colorado has dismissed the Justice Department’s lawsuit over Colorado and Denver immigration restrictions, ending the case at the pleading stage. U.S. District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher issued the order on March 31, 2026, and granted dismissal motions filed by the state defendants and Denver.

The lawsuit challenged a cluster of Colorado statutes and Denver policies that limit how state and local officials collect or share personal information, when they may hold people for immigration authorities, and how they may assist federal immigration officers seeking access to detainees. The government argued those laws were preempted by federal immigration law and unlawfully singled out federal officials for bad treatment.

Gallagher rejected that theory. In the opinion, he wrote that the Supremacy Clause bars states from conflicting with federal law, but does not give the federal government power to compel state or local assistance. He said the Justice Department’s reading of federal immigration authority would require state participation, which runs into the Tenth Amendment and anti-commandeering precedent, including Printz, New York, and Murphy.

The ruling leaves the federal government free to enforce immigration law on its own, but not to turn Colorado or Denver into unwilling partners through this lawsuit. It also aligns the Colorado case with similar federal decisions in other states that have treated sanctuary-style policies as a choice not to participate in civil immigration enforcement rather than a constitutional violation.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.