Story · May 8, 2026

Justice Department Sues Colorado Over Magazine Limit

gun-law offensive Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: The Justice Department filed this lawsuit on May 6, 2026. Colorado’s Supreme Court upheld the magazine law on June 29, 2020, but that decision addressed the Colorado Constitution, not the federal Second Amendment.
Justice Department Sues Colorado Over Magazine Limit

The Justice Department filed a federal lawsuit on May 6, 2026, challenging Colorado’s restriction on magazines above the state’s 15-round limit. The complaint targets Colorado and state public-safety officials and asks a judge to declare the law unlawful and bar the state from enforcing it against possession of the magazines at issue.

In the filing, the department argues that the magazines are commonly owned accessories paired with firearms in lawful use and that Colorado’s restriction cannot survive under the Second Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court. The case is brought under 34 U.S.C. § 12601, the federal civil-rights statute DOJ used to frame the challenge.

The state law has already been litigated in Colorado court. In Rocky Mountain Gun Owners v. Polis, 2020 CO 66, the Colorado Supreme Court upheld the statute on June 29, 2020 under the Colorado Constitution. That decision did not resolve a federal Second Amendment claim, which is what this new case puts before a federal judge.

Colorado’s statute generally bars the sale, transfer, and possession of magazines above the 15-round threshold, while also containing exceptions and grandfathering provisions discussed in the state-court opinion. Unless a court intervenes, the law remains in effect while the federal case moves forward.

Read next

Justice Department Sues Colorado Over Magazine Law

★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5

The Justice Department filed a federal lawsuit on May 6, 2026, targeting Colorado’s large-capacity magazine law and naming the state and the Colorado Department of Public…

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.