Story · May 16, 2026

Appeals court weighs Trump-era order fight involving law firms, Mark Zaid

Law-firm retaliation Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: The D.C. Circuit heard oral arguments on May 14, 2026; it had not issued a ruling at the time of publication.

The D.C. Circuit heard oral arguments on May 14, 2026, in a consolidated appeal over Trump-era executive orders and related actions aimed at Perkins Coie LLP, WilmerHale, Jenner & Block, Susman Godfrey, and attorney Mark Zaid. The court’s public advisory said the hearing was set for Courtroom 20 at 9:30 a.m. and named the Perkins Coie case alongside the Mark Zaid matter. ([cadc.uscourts.gov](https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/news/public-advisory-may-14-2026-oral-arguments-no-25-5241-et-al-perkins-coie-llp-v-doj-et-al-and-no))

The cases are part of a broader fight over orders and agency actions that district courts already blocked from taking effect. The appeal asks the D.C. Circuit to undo those injunctions and allow the challenged measures to move forward. ([cadc.uscourts.gov](https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/news/public-advisory-may-14-2026-oral-arguments-no-25-5241-et-al-perkins-coie-llp-v-doj-et-al-and-no))

One day before the argument, the Justice Department filed a separate complaint against D.C. bar disciplinary authorities. DOJ said the filing was tied to President Donald Trump’s executive order ending what it called weaponization of the federal government and to a presidential memorandum on abuses of the legal system and federal courts. The department said the complaint targets the bar’s handling of discipline involving federal government attorneys. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-files-complaint-against-dc-bar-disciplinary-authorities-over-their))

The appeals court has not yet issued a ruling. Until it does, the district court injunctions remain in effect. ([cadc.uscourts.gov](https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/news/public-advisory-may-14-2026-oral-arguments-no-25-5241-et-al-perkins-coie-llp-v-doj-et-al-and-no))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Check the official docket, read the source documents, and submit a public comment when the agency opens or updates the rulemaking record. Share the primary documents, not just commentary.

Timing: Before the public-comment deadline.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.