Story · May 25, 2026

Trump Issues Separate Banking Orders on Illicit Finance and Fair Access

Banking policy Confidence 5/5
★★★☆☆Fuckup rating 3/5
Major mess Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Correction: The White House said the fintech order seeks to stop regulators from backing policies that let institutions deny or restrict services for political or religious reasons or lawful business activity; it did not use that exact broad wording in the order text itself.

The White House put out two separate financial orders on May 19, and they do not do the same job.

One order, titled "Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System," focuses on illicit finance, customer identification, and what the administration calls credit risk tied to extending loans and other services to non-work-authorized or removable noncitizens. The text directs Treasury to issue an advisory on red flags tied to payroll tax evasion, concealed account ownership, off-the-books wage payments, structuring, labor trafficking, and the use of individual taxpayer identification numbers to open accounts or obtain credit without verified legal presence. It also calls for proposed changes to Bank Secrecy Act regulations to strengthen customer due diligence and, when warranted, let institutions gather more information to identify the real owners behind accounts and assess risk. ([whitehouse.gov](https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/05/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-restores-integrity-to-americas-financial-system/?utm_source=openai))

A second May 19 order, "Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks," takes a different tack. That order pushes federal regulators to review rules, supervisory practices, and application processes that could be updated to help fintech firms and other institutions compete, and it asks the Federal Reserve to examine access to payment accounts and payment services for uninsured depository institutions and non-bank financial companies. The White House’s fact sheet tied that order to fair access language, saying regulators should not promote policies and practices that let financial institutions deny or restrict services because of political beliefs, religious beliefs, or lawful business activity. ([whitehouse.gov](https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/05/integrating-financial-technology-innovation-into-regulatory-frameworks/?query-11-page=24&trk=article-ssr-frontend-pulse_little-text-block&utm_source=openai))

Read together, the two orders show a split-screen approach: tighter screening where the administration sees fraud and illicit activity, and a separate push for broader access and less gatekeeping in financial services. They are related in theme, but they are not one merged directive. That distinction matters because the compliance obligations and policy goals sit in different documents, even if they landed on the same day. ([whitehouse.gov](https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/05/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-integrates-financial-technology-innovation-into-regulatory-frameworks/?utm_source=openai))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

No approved reader images yet. Be the first.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.