Story · June 16, 2026

Judge keeps Trump anti-weaponization fund blocked after DOJ says it’s abandoned

Frozen payout scheme blocked in court Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: Judge did not end the dispute; she extended the block and required sworn declarations before accepting the government’s abandonment claim.
Judge keeps Trump anti-weaponization fund blocked after DOJ says it’s abandoned reader image
Reader image selected by automatic review and community voting.

The Trump administration’s plan to create an Anti-Weaponization Fund remains blocked after a June 12 court hearing in Alexandria, where U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema said the government’s claim that the fund was dead was not enough on its own. The judge kept in place an order stopping the fund from operating while the case continues and said the administration must put its abandonment claim in sworn filings.

The fund came out of a May 18 settlement announcement by the Justice Department in Trump v. Internal Revenue Service, a case brought by Donald J. Trump, Donald J. Trump, Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization over the leak of tax-return information. DOJ said the deal would set up a $1.776 billion process to hear claims from people who say they were harmed by government “lawfare” or “weaponization,” with the money to come from the Judgment Fund and the program to be administered by five members appointed through the settlement structure. The plaintiffs were to receive an apology, not money, and the settlement papers said unused funds would revert to the federal government. ([justice.gov](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-anti-weaponization-fund?utm_source=openai))

The court fight began almost immediately. On May 29, Brinkema temporarily barred the administration from moving ahead with payouts while litigation played out. At the June 12 hearing, the judge extended that block after government lawyers said the fund would not proceed, but plaintiffs’ lawyers pressed for a formal record. Brinkema rejected the government’s mootness argument and required sworn declarations backing up the claim that the fund will not be implemented. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/8baaee6aa8d83f0ad2905f5f8d457dec?utm_source=openai))

That leaves the administration in a narrow spot: it says the fund is being dropped, but the court has not let it treat that statement as the end of the matter. Until the sworn filings are in and the court acts again, the fund stays blocked and no claims can be processed. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/d8345ce8f5c7f8062b858e54c396c450?utm_source=openai))

Support the work

Help keep this site going

If this story was useful, help support The Daily Fuckup. Reader donations help pay for hosting, archives, publishing, email, and AI costs.

Donate

Read next

Jan. 6 Investigations Kept Spreading Beyond the Riot

★★★★★Fuckup rating 5/5

The Jan. 6 investigation kept widening on Sept. 12, 2021, with prosecutors, Congress and the courts all still collecting records and testimony. The immediate fight was no…

Reader action

What can you do about this?

Call or write your members of Congress and tell them the exact outcome you want. Ask for a written response and refer to the bill, hearing, committee fight, or vote tied to this story.

Timing: Before the next committee hearing or floor vote.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Reader images

Upload a relevant meme, screenshot, or photo. Automatic review rejects spam, ads, and unrelated junk. The top-rated approved image becomes the story's main image.

Log in to upload and vote on story images.

Judge keeps Trump anti-weaponization fund blocked after DOJ says it’s abandoned reader image 1
Score: 95 AI / 0 community
By: mike
Current main image

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.