Story · March 25, 2024

Trump’s Manhattan hush-money case kept crowding his campaign schedule

Trial drag Confidence 5/5
★★★★☆Fuckup rating 4/5
Serious fuckup Ranked from 1 to 5 stars based on the scale of the screwup and fallout.
Correction: A March 25 hearing in Manhattan set Donald Trump’s hush-money trial for April 15; the court did not simply keep an April 15 date in place after it had already been set.

Donald Trump’s Manhattan hush-money case was still on the court calendar on March 25, 2024, but not as the opening of trial. By then, Judge Juan Merchan had already granted a delay and pushed jury selection to April 15. The March 25 appearance was set for argument over the defense’s discovery-sanctions motion and related disputes over late-produced material.

The timeline matters. The case had originally been headed for a March 25 start, but Merchan’s March 15 order moved the trial back after the parties raised problems with recently disclosed records. The judge said jury selection would begin no earlier than April 15, and he left the separate sanctions issue for later consideration.

That left Trump with a courtroom obligation instead of a jury box. The former president was still preparing for a criminal case while also trying to run a presidential campaign, a setup that keeps lawyers, aides, and scheduling plans tied to the court’s dates. The practical effect is simple: when the trial shifts, the campaign has to shift with it.

The Manhattan case is also unusual on its own terms. It is the first criminal trial of a former U.S. president. The charges center on allegations that Trump business records were falsified to conceal hush-money payments tied to the 2016 campaign. Those facts had already been established in the public record; what changed on March 25 was the calendar, not the underlying case.

So March 25 was not the day a jury was supposed to start hearing evidence in Manhattan. It was the day the court dealt with the fallout from the delay. The trial had already been moved to April 15, and the defense was still pressing its complaints about the late discovery that helped trigger the postponement.

Proof attached

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Reader action

Follow the court record

Read the filed complaint, order, or opinion and follow the docket as the case develops. Share the primary documents when explaining what the court has—and has not—decided.

This card only appears on stories where there is a concrete, lawful, worthwhile step a reader can actually take.

Comments

Threaded replies, voting, and reports are live. New users still go through screening on their first approved comments.

Log in to comment


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.